11 May 2012

It's all been done

It seems North Carolinans and President Obama have raised quite the hullaballo about same-sex marriages again this week.

This is an issue I'm fairly opinionated about. So I've found myself talking and writing about it again this week. But ... there's just nothing new to say here, folks. It's all been done.

The President supports the right of gays to marry. You know what, that's actually kind of fantastic. But it doesn't change anything, especially not the minds of the people who oppose it.
And conservatives in North Carolina passed an all-but-redundant law declaring that only heterosexuals can marry in their state. Again, nothing much has changed.

It's deja vu all over again.

Here in California, we've been fighting against Prop. 8 - the ballot initiative to eliminate the right of same-sex couples to marry - since 2008. As someone in the apparent voting minority in my state, I feel for those 40 percent or so of compassionate minded North Carolina voters who opposed their state's amendment to institutionalize civil inequality.

But all these "new" headlines are really the same old story: People trying to impose their opinion on others to the point of stooping to create a second class of citizen.

Hell, when you get right down to it, North Carolina's new amendment and California's Prop 8 and other anti-gay marriage actions are all just eerily reminiscent of the same arguments that were put forward to argue against racial integration and inter-racial marriages - 50 years ago.

I'd have hoped we'd have evolved further than that by now.

Maybe I'm lazy or impatient or just plain tired of all the animosity, but, since the anti-gay marriage proponents don't seem to have any new arguments to put forth, I'm not going to waste time crafting new counter-points. Instead, I think I'll just recycle a bit ...

From Still Waiting, 28 October 2008


I still have yet to hear one - just ONE! - rational reason why Californians should pass Proposition 8 - which is an attempt to alter our State Constitution to define "marriage" as a "only between a man and woman".

The most basic premise of our State and Federal Constitutions - the very foundation of our whole Nation - is that ALL people are EQUAL under the law. How can anyone possibly reconcile that deeply held American value of equality with the intention and consequence of this Proposition?

Proposition 8 puts discrimination INTO our Constitution. It requires the government to treat it's citizens differently under the law. And that undermines the very foundation of equality and civil rights we ALL enjoy as Americans.

Whether you personally approve of homosexuality or not is irrelevant. The real question we are deciding is whether or not the Government can pick and chose which of its citizens may have certain civil rights and which may not.

Is that really a slope you want to start travelling down?

From Don't Divorce Us, 6 February, 2009 

I still don't understand why people want to control who other people love and marry. Or why they think they have the right to. I hope the courts will have the courage to correct this injustice. And I hope that more people will be able to grow their compassion and embrace equality.

From By Any Other Name 25 March 2009

Can we just give everybody in California a freakin' dictionary and move on? News Flash: The word "marriage" has more than one meaning. Let's make it simple:

Marriage: 1) A religious or spiritual union or rite, 2) A legal contract with set rights and responsibilities defined by law.

Religions of any kind are free and welcome to set any limits they see fit on Definition #1. But, in this country, no religion has any business trying to legislate Definition #2 to force others to live by their beliefs.

If you want to live in a theocracy, you might try Iran or Saudi Arabia. I'm sure those are lovely places to live. As long as you do and think and be exactly as the church/government believes you should.


From But I Don't Want To Go Among Mad People, 28 May 2009

Substitute "gays" for, say, "Catholics" or "women" or "blacks" or "left-handed". Now substitute "marriage" for "voting" or "driver's license" or "due process" or "free education".
Maybe then you will see how disturbing and wrong this precedent is.

Fundamental rights should not be up for popular vote. Ever. Equality means that everyone is treated equally under the law unless there is an overwhelming reason not to. As soon as we start carving out certain rights for some and not for others, we put all of our rights in danger.


One of the most basic premises of our legal system is that the rights of the minority are not subject to the whims of the majority.


How far down the rabbit hole do we need to fall before people realize that they are only hurting themselves by insisting on creating haves and have-nots?
Will you only realize the damage you have done when it is your rights on the chopping block?

"If everybody minded their own business,
the world would go around a great deal faster than it does."
~ The Duchess, Alice in Wonderland

From All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others, 11 January 2010

The rights set forth in our Constitution seem so simple; we sometimes take them for granted now. But, for our founding fathers, it was a paradigm-changing philosophy that set their fledgling constitutional republic apart as a nation of new ideals.

We have, as a nation, not always lived up to those ideals of equality. But we've been moving in the right direction - slowly but surely - throughout our history. Socially, each generation has learned to be just  a little more compassionate and tolerant than the last. Legally, the precedents over the last 200 years have been building a ladder toward that high-minded ideal set forth by our founding fathers so long ago.

And today, the Courts will hear a case that could throw us back down to the bottom rung.

If the "majority" of voters can decide that a whole class of people can be denied equal treatment under the law - in any form - then who or what will be next?


###

If you want a fresher opinion, you might check out Newark Mayor Cory Booker's excellent analysis of the subject:



You can also read Whit Honea's perspective over at Dadding. His is, as always, a compassionate and reasonable voice.

And then there's this sweet and simple sentiment from the very fun and funny Hannah Hart:

When news like North Carolina's new amendment drags my spirit down, people like these give me hope.

Namaste,

 Zen

17 February 2012

Feelin' Crafty


Behold: My creation! *lighting crashes* Mwahahahahahaha!


I'd seen these cute little purses made from books at Etsy and other places and, being a huge book nerd, of course, I lusted for one of my own.

But they seemed so expensive, when I knew they could be made for so much less money. And yet, I was too intimidated to try to make one myself. (My crafting projects too often end in tears and feelings of inadequacy.)

But, after a friend of mine made this gorgeous bag for herself ...


  ... I got the guts to try to make my own.
 
I took bits and pieces from several tutorials I found online and Frankenstein'd my own method of doing it.

Mostly, this involved me thinking, "Now, how how can I do that without any sewing?" Cuz, you know, laziness is the mother of invention. Or something like that.

As I'm generally pleased with my results, I thought I'd share the method to my madness.

PROLOGUE

Frankly, I was too focused on figuring out how to make it work to really document my steps very well, though I did, obviously, snap a few pics along the way. So, as far as step-by-step tutorials go, this is a little weak. Think of it as more of an inspirational report than a how-to manual. ;)

TABLE OF CONTENTS:
  • A hard-cover book
    Just this once, you should judge a book by its cover: I find older books and children's books have some of the best covers. But, for this, I chose one of Barnes & Noble's Leatherbound Classic Series. Specifically, Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles. My friend used Grimm's Fairy Tales from the same series. It was actually really hard to choose just one book - they had so many of my favorites with such gorgeous covers! I wanted to buy them all. But, then, I get that feeling in bookstores all the time. The final deciding factor for me was size: The Anne Rice anthology was more than twice as wide as most of the others, meaning a bigger purse.
  • Coordinating fabric
    How much depends on the size of your book. I bought four fabric quarters - two each of a Gothic-looking black/purple tie-dye and a bright arterial red to complement my blood-sucking fiends theme - and that was more than enough - even with a few mistakes and re-cuts. (Most of the bags I've seen use only one fabric. But I wanted different colors for the sides and lining.)
  • Purse handles
    I went with pre-made. My friend made her own out of wire and beads. It doesn't really matter, as long as they coordinate with your book/bag.
  • Glue
    I mostly used fabric glue - the kind you can buy at any craft store for hemming and the like. But you could use hot glue or other kinds of crafting glue.
  • Cardboard
    Sturdy, but not too thick. Enough to cover the front, back and spine of your book. 
  • Plastic report cover
  • A utility knife, scissors, 2-3 blank pieces of paper, a pencil and maybe a ruler.
All of these supplies cost me somewhere in the neighborhood of $35-40 - including the $20 book.

You'll note that this list does NOT include a sewing machine or a needle and thread. Again, this is sheer sewing-aversion on my part. My bag is sew-free. Yours doesn't have to be. Just substitute "neatly sew a lovely hem" for "glue the shit out of it" and you're good to go. ;)

Or, if you're the sewing type, you should check out this great how-to article at Hungry Panda. I loved the concept of her design, but the thought of all that sewing made me start to hyperventilate.

CHAPTER 1: Remove the cover

Yes, this is absolutely the most painful step - you have to cut the pages from the book. I know! I might have wept a little. I recommend doing it quickly - like ripping off a band-aid.

Use your utility knife to cut through the end paper and stitches holding the cover to the pages. But, carefully, so as not to cut any pages or the spine binding itself. Because we are going to recover that book when we're done, are we not?

Now that your book is naked, take it's measurements: Use blank paper to trace the front and back covers and spine. Then stand the book on it's edge, open it to the width you want your bag to open to, and trace that triangle outline all the way around the book, including a straight line along the front opening.

CHAPTER 2: The Guts: Preparation 

From this article at Wiki-How, I borrowed the idea of using fabric-covered cardboard inserts for the bottom and sides of the bag, to help reinforce the the book/bag and make installation easier:

Cut out two pieces of thin cardboard that are just a little smaller than the front and back covers of your book and one that is just a bit smaller than the spine.

The finished pieces should fit all together inside your book, while it is closed, without going over any of the edges. Check this sizing and then double-check it. And then check it again. THEN, use fabric glue to cover the cardboard with your fabric. 

(As you can see, my craftier-than-I-am friend added some awesome pockets to the lining of her bag. I do love pockets, but they didn't fit into my no-sew agenda, so they got left on the drawing board for this bag. If there's ever a sequel to this project, I'll probably try to add pockets.)

CHAPTER 3: Handles

I went with a single loop handle and attached them to the middle of the bag with one strap for each. You can see on my friend's bag that she went with the half-loop handles that attach to the bag in two places, requiring a total of four straps. There are pros and cons to each, but really it's your preference.

To attach the handles, I cut two long strips of the red fabric I used for the "guts" of the bag and "hemmed" the long edges with fabric glue. (Don't worry about the short edges.)

I just looped the fabric through the handles and glued the bottom part of the fabric securely to each side of the inside of the book cover - making sure that the handles were even with each other vertically and horizontally.

I think this method of using one strap per handle is a little easier than trying to make sure that FOUR handle straps are all even and equidistant. But, again: I'm a lazy crafter. The potential drawback to this method is that the strap sits right in the middle of the purse, so it could get in the way of the ...

CHAPTER 4: Clasp/Closure

A lot of the tutorials I saw used ribbon and a button - one mounted on each side of the bag in the center, to hold the book/purse closed. I liked the concept, but, as I said, my "middle" was kinda taken up by my strap. So, I just moved my button over to one side. I used a satin-covered black button and thin black leather twine that I had on hand, rather than a ribbon.

I threaded the leather through the button, leaving a long tail and secured that to the inside of the book with glue and electrical tape (No, it's not pretty, but it's strong and no one will ever see it.) with the button just poking out over the top of the book. On the opposite cover, I secured a loop of the black leather the same way - again, with just enough poking over the top of the book to be able to hook around the button and hold the bag closed.

One word of advice that I was thankful that my friend shared with me: Check the distance on this closure carefully and use something that has a little "give" for the strap. You want the book to stay closed, but not so tightly that it cuts off your storage space inside. I considered elastic, but I didn't have any on hand to try out. Plus, I liked the black leather. Hey, who doesn't? ;)

CHAPTER 5: Side Panels

I'm not gonna lie to you, Marge: This was the hard part. If you have access to another pair of hands, this is the time to call in reinforcements.

I found several slightly different, but all good, methods for doing this online. If it weren't for my severe allergy to sewing, I probably would have used this one at Curbly. But, I did this instead: 

Take that triangle tracing from waaaay up there in Chapter 1 and add about an inch to the sides and a couple of inches to the top. This is the template for cutting out the side panels for your bag.

Double over your fabric and cut a triangle from your template. Glue/hem the two sides of the doubled-over fabric together. Repeat, so that you have two equal-sized side panels.

I stole this idea from Jen Yates at EPBOT: Cut a medium weight plastic (like the kind you'd use for a report cover) into two horizontal strips about 1 inch tall and about an inch shy of the length of the top of your triangles.

Hem (glue) that plastic strip into the top of the fabric and crease it in the middle, so that the point of the crease points to the inside of the bag. This helps the side panels to fold inward, as opposed to outward, when the bag closes.

Glue the bottom point of the triangle to the inside of the spine of the book on one side - carefully checking the height before gluing to make sure the panels reach, but do not go past, the top of the book cover. Ditto on the other side.

Yes, I wish I had taken pictures of this part. But I didn't. Fortunately, Country Living did, for their very excellent tutorial on the subject.

Now take the spine-sized piece of cardboard that you covered in fabric earlier and glue it down on top of the edges of the triangles that you just glued down.(You can wait until step 6 to do this, but I thought doing it now was easier and less messy.)

Glue the long edges of the fabric up along the inside of the book covers.

That is so much harder than it sounds. Seriously, that one sentence does not accurately convey the contortions and cursing required to hold the book open at just the right angle with one hand while simultaneously holding the fabric in place with another hand while gluing the fabric down with another hand. Yes, that's at least three hands - that's my point!

So, learn from my mistakes: Either get another hand or two to help you hold the book in place or put together some kind of contraption to prop the book open at the right angle while you are gluing the sides.


CHAPTER 6: Guts: Installation

Once you've got the side panels glued in place and have let them dry - I took my time and let each side dry a bit before moving on to the next - then it's all down hill from here:

Just take the cardboard "guts" that you covered in fabric earlier and glue them in place to the insides of your bag. I used some paper clamps to hold the insides to the cover while the glue dried, which really doesn't take long.

Voila! You now have a lovely book-bag perfect for every nerdy occasion!

But, wait! There's still one last thing to do:

CHAPTER  7: Re-cover your book!

Unless the pages of the book you used were un-salvageable, you'll want to re-cover them to save the book for actual reading! Don't worry: It's not hard.

I re-covered the pages of my book with cardboard and some light denim fabric I had lying around. It's certainly not as pretty as the original cover. But the pages are protected and readable. :)

EPILOGUE

I know I don't usually do this crafty-mom thing on my blog (or in real life!).

But, I'm so pleased that I was able to make this successfully, that I want to share. Who knows, maybe there's some other book-loving-but-sewing-challenged person out there feeling, as I was, a little intimidated by this particular project.

So, if you want your very own "book bag" - don't be afraid to try it. And absolutely DO post a link to a pic here if you make one of your own!

No, my bag is not "perfect" - but it's mine. I made it. And I had fun making it. And that'd be enough right there to make me love it.

Bonus: It's a gorgeous book cover and I think I did a half-way decent job of transforming into a fun and useful bag. I even took it on it's first outing the other night - to my son's school's "Literacy Night". It seemed a fitting debut. I can't wait to wear it to even more geeky places.

The End,
 
 Zen

14 February 2012

As You Wish

Happy VD! ;p

Yeah, I know, I've pretty much made it clear in the past that I'm not a big fan of V-Day.

As far as February holidays go, I much prefer those that involve prognosticating rodents, as opposed to a made-up (I know, technically, they are all made-up, but you know what I mean.), commercialized, over-sentimentalized holiday designed to squish the most complicated of all emotions into a 24-hour window of "displays of affection".

Still ... I'm not entirely unsentimental.

In fact, this year, I'm offering a glimpse of my soft white underbelly by admitting that I am kind of a sucker for romantic movies, well, some of them, anyway. I know! It's so ... so ... girly! But, I can't help it. I just have a soft spot for them. Many of them live happily in my DVD cabinet next to my action flicks, sci-fi collections and kung-fu movies. There are even a few classic musicals dancing around in there. It's an eclectic neighborhood of a cupboard, to be sure, but they all get along.

So, in honor of Valentine's Day, here are 21 of my favorite romantic movies, in no particular order:


1. The Princess Bride One of my all-time favorite movies of any sort and smashing good tale of "Wuv. Twue Wuv."

2. An Affair to Remember
This is a remake of the classic Love Affair from 1939, and it's a story that's been re-told on the big screen several times, but this Carey Grant and Deborah Kerr version will always be my favorite. I still tear up at the end. Every. Time.

3. Bull Durham
"Well, I believe in the soul, the cock, the pussy, the small of a woman's back, the hanging curve ball, high fiber, good scotch, that the novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent, overrated crap. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft, wet kisses that last three days."  ... Nuff said.

4. Casablanca
Really? If I even need to explain this one, you should just stop reading now. 

5. Wall-E
I don't care if he is a trash-bot - don't even try to tell me that the montage of him trying to wake and woo the dormant EVE is not some of the most sweetest footage ever, animated or otherwise. Speaking of ... 

6. Up
If you know anyone who doesn't get at least a little choked up by the end of the first 10 minutes of this film, check their pulse.

7. Notorious
More Carey Grant - gawd, I love that man - this time paired with Ingrid Bergman in a war-time spy thriller directed by Alfred Hitchcock. Okay, I know Nazi Germany doesn't sound romantic, but, if you haven't seen it, you're gonna hafta just trust me on this one. There's this one kiss - omg, I melt.

8. Breakfast at Tiffany's 
Bittersweet and charming, this one is Audrey Hepburn in one of her best roles.

9. Sabrina (1954)
Audrey Hepburn again, in a lighter role this time and paired with Bogart in a classic romance with some very cute moments.

10. Charade
We've already established my love for Audrey Hepburn and Carey Grant, so how can I NOT love them together? Especially when they're hip-deep in espionage

11. Brigadoon
Gene Kelly sings and dances his way around the Highlands of Scotland with Cyd Charisse while sarcastic Van Johnson cracks wise - that would be enough to make me love it right there. But, there's a sweet and sappy romance at the heart of this fanciful musical that just appeals to the fairy-tale loving little girl in me.


12. Dirty Dancing "Nobody puts Baby in a corner." I was about 13 when it first came out , so it will always be a formative romance for me and it still makes me *sigh* a little, and remember what it feels like to fall in love for the first time.

13. Pretty in Pink
Again - a formative one for me, as were almost all of John Hughes' films. His movies felt very "real" to a lot of teenagers at a time in life when it's hard to find anything to connect to at all. For the nostalgia factor alone, this would continue to be a favorite.

14. When Harry Met Sally
The anti love-at-first-sight romance. Sweet, funny, quirky - everything love (and a love story) should be.

15. French Kiss
Another quirky love-in-strange places theme with the adorable, everybody-loves-her Meg Ryan. But it's Kevin Kline who really makes this movie for me.

16. Armageddon
The innocent joy of sweet, romantic love and the heart-wrenching sacrifice of omg-it-still-makes-me-cry parental love, both reflected in the unbelievably sweet face of Liv Tyler. Bonus: Steve Buscemi trying to ride a nuke.

17. While You Were Sleeping
I love Sandra Bullock, and she and Bill Pullman are so quirky and cute in this. I can watch this one over and over.

18. The Proposal
One of the few more recent romances to make more than a blip on my radar. Probably more for the fact that I adore both Ryan Reynolds and Sandra Bullock than because of anything genius in the movie itself. But it has some really sweet and funny moments that give it re-watch-ability for me.

19. Shakespeare in Love
I like to think the Bard himself would have liked this tale casting himself as a star-crossed lover.  

20. Say Anything
How can you not love that moment? Gawd, I haven't seen this one in ages. I might have to go watch it now.

21. Terminator
Shut up. It is TOO a romance.

I'm sure I've left out other great movies, trying to keep the list manageable. And, as you can see, my tastes tend to run to mostly older movies. What romantic movies would YOU add the list? Do you have favorite "classics"? Are there other modern romances you think I should give a try?

Gentlemen: These questions are not just for the ladies of the club; don't be afraid to chime in on this, too! My movies tastes generally run to "guy flicks" anyway. Share!

Love,

 Zen

01 February 2012

The Time(line)s, they are a'changin'


If you haven't waded into the new Facebook Timeline yet, you'll be thrown into the deep end shortly.

*Pause for mandatory moaning and groaning*

I know, I know. I wasn't a huge fan of most of Facebook's "improvements" over the last few years, either. But, we survived them. Got used to them, even. And, like it or not, it's Facebook's pool - we just swim in it. So, strap on your goggles and arm-floaties and take a deep breath. (Shut up, you know you are so not getting out of the water.)

Knowing resistance was futile, I decided to dip into FB's Timeline a while back, while it was still optional, to give myself some time to play with it. So, I figured I'd offer my Good, Bad and Ugly (and Pretty) report on the subject:

THE GOOD

Honestly, I kind of like the aesthetics of the Timeline.

It took me a few days to get used to it. But, once you do, it's a fairly intuitive interface. It's basically just a vertical chronological list of of your posts: statuses, photos, app updates, etc. are all in one long line going from the present alllllll the way down to "Born."

Yep, FB's timeline is now, literally, your whole life scrolling before your eyes.

Of course, for most people, the years between "born" and "joined facebook" on your Timeline are pretty much blank - but they don't have to be. You can add "life events" to your timeline - complete with a photo/video, a story, a location, and "tags", should you so desire. You can list marriages, divorces, births, deaths, moves, education, personal achievements, the addition of a pet, the installation of new body art and just about any other kind of personal milestone you can think of.

I added my sons' births (month and year only) and a few other tidbits. But, to be honest, I don't know anyone who's used these life events much or gone back to add to their pre-fb years. But it'll be interesting to see how people use it going forward.

The scroll-through-your-whole-life format also makes Facestalking easier. That could be a good or a bad, depending on which side of the stalkee/stalker relationship you happen to fall ... which brings us to ...


THE BAD

Privacy. Of course. Let's face it, FB doesn't have a great track record with respecting your personal privacy.

And, at first glance, the new Timeline feels like FB trying yet again to make your personal information more public. But, really, the Timeline doesnt change any of your personal privacy settings - it ony makes the content that was already out there a little easier to navigate.

With the FB Profile, users had to scroll through pages and pages and pages of posts to see your "old" stuff. Now, they can use the hand-dandy mini-timeline to the right of your home page to jump to any given month or year of your life. "Gee, I wonder what Zen was posting back when she started that new work assignment ... let's just zip on over to June, 2009 and take a little look-see, eh? Ooooo, she had some anger issues ... let's just change the privacy setting on those."

But, that's the good news about the bad news: You still have the same level of control over the privacy of your posts. You can scroll through your timeline (or your "activity list" - a streamlined version of your timeline that only you can see) and select the audiences for each post: Don't want your boss to see those pics of you on the fishing boat last year?  You can delete it, remove it from your timeline, or limit the audience to your "fishing buddies" group. Up to you.

Personally, I've been using FB's friend lists (personal friends vs work colleagues vs family vs acquaintances, etc.) to limit visibility of specific posts for a while now, so it wasn't too difficult to go back through and police a few of my random older posts that might not be suitable for all audiences.

BUT, if you've been on FB a long time and/or have a lot of old posts that you're concerned about, it could be pretty grueling to go back through your entire timeline to set privacy settings on each one. If FB sticks to it's current Timeline rollout process, you should have one week between your Timeline activating for you and when it goes public. If you have questionable or need-to-be private past posts, I suggest using that week wisely. You can use the handy "view as" near the top right to see how your Timeline will appear to specific friends or the public.

Your photo albums privacy settings should remain unchanged, but your photos will be a little more prominent in your timeline now. So, don't forget to check those settings, too.

The other privacy related potential danger-zone you might want to check is the "Map" ... This is a good article about that.

The truth is that you should never pretend that ANYTHING you put on the web is ever really "private".  But, at least with a little bit of work, your FB content shouldn't be any LESS private that it already was.

THE UGLY


With the roll-out of the Timeline, FB has cranked up App sharing to an 11. To hear FB tell it, this is a good thing. To me, this is more like over-sharing on steroids. T.M. effing. I.
But, again, you have some options (Under Accont Settings: Apps): You can delete or deauthorize an app, of course. But you can also change the sharing default of most apps to limit the audience that is bombarded with your latest eating, shopping, listening, reading, watching, traveling, decorating, and grooming activities.

Please. Do. This.

It's not that I don't want to know about every little thing you're up to ... okay, yes, it partly IS that ... but, to me, this over-sharing detracts from "real" communication and connection, rather than adds to it.  It just turns into so much visual White Noise on my screen. After a while, it gets hard to tune out the trivial and I'm a lot more likely to miss the important stuff that you actually WANT me to read.

THE PRETTY
 
One new feature I quite like about the Timeline is the "Cover Photo". Kind of like a blog header, the cover photo takes up the whole top of your Timeline and is the first thing people see when they visit your page.

(One note of caution, even if the rest of your profile is locked down tight and private, your Cover photo will be public. No way out of that, currently. So, choose wisely.)

Some people have gotten really creative with their Facebook Covers. But you don't have to be a graphic artist to use the Cover Photo: Just upload a new pic or choose one of your existing ones - landscape-orientation works best, of course. If the image is too small, FB will add a border around it. If it's too large, you can drag it about to place it just how you want.

If you want to add a slightly higher degree of difficulty, you can make a custom Cover - the size is 851 by 315.

Or, feel free to steal one of mine: I've been playing with some just for kicks and giggles.

Because I'm a geek. That's what we do for fun. Shut up. :p

YOUR TURN

So, have you tried out the new Timeline yet? What do you like and dislike about it? Any tips or tricks to share?

If you hate it ... well, the final bit of good news is that FB seems to "improve" it's interface about every 12.6 seconds. So, if you hate it, just wait a while. I'm sure they'll come up with something you hate even more very shortly. ;p

Embracing change,
Zen

ZEN'S FB COVERS
(click through for full sizes)

This one reminds me of a few bloggers I know:
From fb-covers
For the geeky coffee lover:
From fb-covers
Duh. I had to have a Zen Garden cover:
From fb-covers
For TheOneSFD:
From fb-covers
I so wish I had taken this:
From fb-covers
Who doesn't love Calvin and Hobbes?
From fb-covers
Ever have one of those days?
From fb-covers
Good advice all the time:
From fb-covers
For the Browncoats:
From fb-covers
Goes without saying:
From fb-covers
This one's for Mathew and Megan:
From fb-covers
And for the Whovians:
From fb-covers
And for all of us still waiting for our letter from Hogwarts:
From fb-covers
But wait, there's more ...


(Disclaimer: Some of these Covers are my original work, but most are derivatives of other people's images. I don't claim copyright on any of them.)

06 January 2012

On Little Cat Feet

I vlog'd.




The fog comes
on little cat feet.

It sits looking
over harbor and city
on silent haunches
and then moves on.


~ Carl Sandburg (1878-1967)


Happy commuting,

Zen

03 January 2012

We read to know that we are not alone

Happy New Year!

I've pretty much established the fact that I don't have much use for New Year's Resolutions in general. But, for 2011, I did set a resolution-like goal for myself: To read a minimum of 60 books.

Based on recent years, that seemed like a realistic, but challenging goal.

I'm pleased to say I made it to 61. Though, I have to admit, I know I could have read more. There were a few times this year when I went weeks without any "pleasure reading" at all - which is very unlike me and is probably a testament to just how crazy 2011 was. (As is the dearth of posts here on the ol' blog-front, I know.) In fact, about 45 of those 60 books were all read in the first 6-7 months of the year. So, fall and winter were obviously pretty lacking in "me-time".

Still, I've set the same goal for 2012 ... but (shhhh!) I'm secretly hoping to beat it buy a greater margin than my stunning one-more-than-planned in 2011. ;)

Like my reading lists for the last few years, 2011 was chock full o' brain candy and speculative fiction. But there are a few exceptions.

One notable standout - for me - is an actual best-seller! I almost never read those. I guess I'm something of a ... what's the opposite of a books-snob? Wait, I think that's still a book snob. Just a different kind. ;)  But, in general, if it's "popular", I'm almost almost instinctively averse to reading it. Strange, I know. But, still true.

And yet, something about this one appealed to me ... so, for one of my last reads of 2011, I got a copy of The Hunger Games on Kindle ... and read it straight through (virtual) cover to cover in about 4 hours. And then I did the exact same thing with it's two sequels. (Those are on my 2012 list.) I have to admit - they were really good books. You should read them.

What did YOU read that was pleasantly surprising this year? :)

Happy Reading,

Zen

"We read to know that we are not alone." ~ C.S. Lewis 

Good Reads 2010  |  Good Reads 2009  |  Good Reads 2008



2011 Reading List


Kick Ass


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Black Magic Sanction


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Blameless


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Bayou Moon


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Storm Front


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Unshapely Things


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Beg For Mercy


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


How to Traumatize Your Children


2 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, funny, non-fiction, and parenting


Curran


5 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Hunter


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and sf


Serenity: Those Left Behind


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, graphic-novel, and sf


The Guild


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and graphic-novel


Better Days


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, sf, and graphic-novel


Fool Moon


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Grave Peril


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Wicked Appetite


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
funny, mystery-suspense, and 2011


Sizzling Sixteen


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
funny, 2011, and mystery-suspense


Summer Knight


5 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy, mystery-suspense, and 2011


Kitty Goes to War


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Angel Of Mercy


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Cry Mercy


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


A Girl's Guide to Guns and Monsters


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Sherlock Holmes in Orbit


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
sf, 2011, and mystery-suspense


A Girl's Guide to Guns and Monsters


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Hard Magic


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy, mystery-suspense, and 2011


Secrets of the Demon


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, mystery-suspense, and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Spirit Dances


0 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Magic Mourns


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Indulgence in Death


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and mystery-suspense


The Atlantis Complex


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, fantasy, and kids-ya


Fathers and Sons


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


You Suck


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, urban-paranormal-fantasy, and funny


River Marked


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Magic Slays


5 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Pale Demon


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Death Masks


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Blood Rites


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Dead Beat


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Mysteria


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Phenomenal Girl 5


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Proven Guilty


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011


Smokin' Seventeen


5 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, mystery-suspense, and funny


Treachery in Death


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and mystery-suspense


The Electric Church


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and sf


White Night


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Small Favor


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


The Digital Plague


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and mystery-suspense


Good Eats: The Early Years


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and non-fiction


Good Eats 2: The Middle Years


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and non-fiction


Blood Work


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Necroscope


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Silver Shark


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Explosive Eighteen


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011, mystery-suspense, and funny


Down These Strange Streets


3 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


Shady Lady


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
2011 and urban-paranormal-fantasy


New York to Dallas


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
mystery-suspense and 2011


Heartless


4 of 5 stars




tagged:
urban-paranormal-fantasy and 2011







goodreads.com